Editorial standards
Sonus Blog Editorial and Review Policy
Sonus publishes practical AI music guides to help readers complete a specific creative task. This page explains how those guides are prepared and what readers should expect from product claims, examples, localization, and updates.
What we publish
We focus on AI music creation methods, prompt writing, arrangement decisions, production workflows, and concrete creative scenarios. An article should answer a distinct reader question and provide steps or examples that can be applied without unnecessary background.
Product and fact review
The editorial team checks Sonus feature names and workflow descriptions against the current product experience, with product-team review where needed. We do not present unverified prices, rights, rankings, performance data, user numbers, or output guarantees as facts.
Prompt examples are starting points. Generative results can vary, so examples should not be read as a promise that a model will reproduce every requested detail.
AI assistance and human editing
Software and AI-assisted tools may support research organization, drafting, translation, or consistency checks. Articles are edited before publication for search intent, usefulness, factual risk, product accuracy, repetition, and natural language. We do not intentionally publish an unreviewed automated draft.
Localization, corrections, and updates
Localized editions preserve the same core guidance while adapting terminology and examples for each language. Automated checks verify page structure and translation coverage; readers can still report awkward wording or factual issues through the available Sonus feedback channels.
The updated date changes when an article receives a meaningful content, product, or accuracy revision—not simply to make an older page appear new.